About paradebomb2

Description

file down site
down site
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. p2p 순위 Especially regarding videos, the next cloud should be downloaded all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself is already a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format, such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but that is as far as the next cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

Compared to the next cloud, it is very disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources. Another cloud only needs to be in a folder.

You should share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there is a saying that N drive appears like an area drive when installed, but only it happens like a local drive, that is no different from the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks in it. It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***

It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it is the only cloud that can play sound sources in an environment similar to MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it appears to play around 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have low quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, if a picture is within a document, it really is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication problems with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. So when it's in that state, you need to discover the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are for sale to file viewing. Except for those points, you'll find nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, nearly every simple document is OK.

It is beneficial to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly. This can be a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to interact with other Google services such as Gmail.

If you don't upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capability of the file does not take into account cloud storage (what do you mean, if you just use the web app, the capability of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. It is possible to flip through photos and videos can be played right away. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.

There are probably the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it's the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a little pdf file and change it to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it really is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There is a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, it is possible to save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it is the same as when you lose your Internet connection, you are going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, but it is still crude in comparison to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a certain amount of buffering time for every photo). However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling is possible without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It's the best in the world in terms of media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It's a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that may be uploaded from a free account is the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity may be the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There is a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself can't be documented.

There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. If you need to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is really a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a website to share data conveniently with little usage of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB monthly, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's even worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's better to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit may be the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will undoubtedly be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it's better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. But the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, even though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it's not that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps is the most backward cloud service ever.

Sorry, no listings were found.